| Bangalore International Centre had organized
a Talk by Prof. Michael Tharakan, Shri Ramakrishna Hegde
Chair in Decentralisation and Governance, Institute for
Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Bangalore on 25th February,
2008 at 6.30 PM. Prof. Tharakan talked on the subject
“Rethinking Democratic – popular representation
in Decision Making and Governance : A Discussion in the
context of Decentralisation”.
In a lucid and erudite presentation, Prof. Tharakan
outlined the course of process of democratic decentralization
in India and the thinkers who influenced it over the
years. He stressed that the motivation of the imperialist
British Rulers was quite different from Indian leaders,
like Mahatma Gandhi and M N Roy. While for the British
it was largely an issue of enlightened self-interest,
dictated by a desire to consolidate their hold on the
Indians through a mild dose of local self-government,
it was an act of faith for leaders like Gandhiji who
fervently believed that self-sufficient and self-contained
autonomous village republics were the need of the day.
Dealing with the historical evolution of democratic
decentralization process in the post-independence period,
Prof. Tharakan pointed out that a majority of the political
leaders, with the exception of Mahatma Gandhi and a
few of the Gandhi-ites, plumped in for the Westminister
pattern of democracy and pushed the Gandhian ideal of
village republics to the back-burner. Viewed against
this backdrop, the 73rd and 74th amendments of the Constitution
of India marked a virtual watershed. Prof. Tharakan
opined that the process of democratic decentralization
has taken roots only in those states where effective
and meaningful land reforms has taken place and that
it is unlikely to take roots in other places unless
the glaring assyemtry of resources within the economy
particularly within the rural areas, is minimized.
In the lively interactive session which followed, several
members pointed out the aberrations and systemic deficiencies
which have crept into the Panchayati Raj system and
felt that the system had no future. In his gentle way,
Prof. Tharakan agreed that there were warts in the face
of democratic decentralization process; however, one
need not discard the face altogether because of warts.
Shri K Jairaj, Principal Secretary, Rural Development
and Panchayati Raj, Government of Karnataka presided
over the session.
|